Archive

Research Nut: Almonds

Lipid lowering effect of almonds (Prunus Dulcis) in healthy adults.

Tahir, F.N., M. Danyal, S.I.A. Shah, J.A. Qureshi, 2019. Lipid lowering effect of almonds (Prunus Dulcis) in healthy adults. Pakistan Journal of Medical and Health Sciences. 12(4):1356-1358.

Background: Almonds (Prunus dulcis) are low in saturated fats and cholesterol and high in unsaturated fatty acids. Almonds also contain high concentrations of other nutrients like vitamin E, plant sterols, phytochemicals and dietary fibers. Almonds are associated with a reduced risk of cardiovascular disorders (CVD) by having a potentially beneficial impact of on serum lipids due to their nutrient composition. Aim: To investigate the effect of regular almond consumption on the serum lipid profile of normolipidemic adults. Methods: In this non-randomized prospective study, 19 normolipidemic adults (10 males, 9 females) with an age range from 21 to 60 years consumed 50 grams of raw almonds for 30 days. Fasting blood samples were collected from each participant at baseline and on the 31st day for lipid profile analysis. Results: Marked decreases in serum total cholesterol level (p-value= 0.000) and serum low-density lipoprotein (LDL) level (p-value= 0.047) were observed from baseline values following almond treatment for a month. An increase in high density lipoprotein (HDL) level was also seen but it was not statistically significant (p-value=0.081). Conclusion: Regular intake of almonds can help maintain a normal lipid profile in healthy adults and reduce the risk of CVD. Almond consumption should be encouraged in the local healthy population for improved metabolic and cardiovascular health outcomes.

The association between metabolic syndrome and peanuts, pine nuts, almonds consumption: The Ansan and Ansung Study.

Jung, J.Y., S.K. Park, C.-M. Oh, J.-M. Choi, J.-H. Ryoo, J. Kim, M.K. Kim, 2019. The association between metabolic syndrome and peanuts, pine nuts, almonds consumption: The Ansan and Ansung Study. Endocrine. 65(2):270-277.

Background: Previous studies reported an inverted relationship between nut consumption and the incidence of metabolic syndrome (MetS). The present study investigated the incidental risk for MetS according to peanut, almond, and fine nut consumption in the Korean population. Methods: In a community-based Korean cohort, 5306 Korean adults were divided into four groups according to their peanut, almond, and pine nut intake (<1/month, 1/month-0.5/week, 0.5-1/week, and ≥1/week, in which one serving = 15 g) and were followed-up for 10 years. A Cox proportional hazard model was used to evaluate the hazard ratios (HRs) with confidence intervals (CI) for MetS in each study group. Age subgroup (≥50 or <50 years) analysis was also conducted. Results: The age and multivariable-adjusted HRs with 95% CIs for MetS showed a significant inverse dose-response relationship between peanut, almond, and pine nut intake and the incidence of MetS in men and women (multivariable-adjusted HRs [95% CI] in men; 0.91 [0.76-1.09] in 1/month-0.5/week, 1.03 [0.80-1.31] in 0.5-1/week, 0.72 [0.56-0.93] in ≥1/week and in women; 0.81 [0.65-1.003] in 1/month-0.5/week, 0.76 [0.54-1.07] in 0.5-1/week, 0.57 [0.41-0.79] ≥1/week)). Subgroup analysis showed a significant difference in middle-aged men (≥1/week) and old-aged women (≥0.5/week). Conclusion: The results of the present study suggested that peanut, almond, and pine nut intake (≥15 g/week) may be inversely related to incidence risk of MetS in the Korean general population. Additionally, the association between nut consumption and MetS incidence risk may differ in sex and age subgroups.

Nut consumption in relation to cardiovascular disease incidence and mortality among patients with diabetes mellitus.

Liu, G., M. Guasch-Ferre, Y. Hu, Y. Li, F.B. Hu, E.B. Rimm, J.E. Manson, K. Rexrode, Q. Sun, 2019. Nut consumption in relation to cardiovascular disease incidence and mortality among patients with diabetes mellitus. Circulation Research. doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.118.314316

Rationale: The evidence regarding the potential health benefits of nut consumption among individuals with type 2 diabetes is limited. Objective: To examine intake of total and specific types of nuts, including tree nuts and peanuts, in relation to subsequent risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD), including coronary heart disease (CHD) and stroke, and all-cause and cause-specific mortality among individuals with diabetes. Methods and Results: This prospective analysis included 16,217 men and women with diabetes at baseline or diagnosed during follow-up (Nurses’ Health Study: 1980-2014, Health Professionals Follow-Up Study: 1986-2014). Nut consumption was assessed using a validated food frequency questionnaire and updated every 2-4 years. During 223,682 and 254,923 person-years of follow-up, there were 3,336 incident CVD cases and 5,682 deaths. Higher total nut consumption was associated with a lower risk of CVD incidence and mortality. The multivariate-adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) for participants who consumed 5 or more servings of total nuts per week (1 serving=28g), compared with those who consumed less than 1 serving per month, were 0.83 (0.71-0.98; P trend=0.01) for total CVD incidence, 0.80 (0.67-0.96; P trend=0.005) for CHD incidence, 0.66 (0.52-0.84; P trend<0.001) for CVD mortality, and 0.69 (0.61-0.77; P trend<0.001) for all-cause mortality. Total nut consumption was not significantly associated with risk of stroke incidence or cancer mortality. For specific types of nuts, higher tree nut consumption was associated with lower risk of total CVD, CHD incidence, and mortality due to CVD, cancer, and all causes, while peanut consumption was associated with lower all-cause mortality only (all P trend<0.001). In addition, compared with participants who did not change the consumption of total nuts from pre- to post-diabetes diagnosis, participants who increased consumption of total nuts after diabetes diagnosis had an 11% lower risk of CVD, a 15% lower CHD risk, a 25% lower CVD mortality, and a 27% lower all-cause mortality. The associations persisted in subgroup analyses stratified by sex/cohort, body mass index at diabetes diagnosis, smoking status, diabetes duration, nut consumption before diabetes diagnosis, or diet quality. Conclusions: Higher consumption of nuts, especially tree nuts, is associated with lower CVD incidence and mortality among participants with diabetes. These data provide novel evidence that supports the recommendation of incorporating nuts into healthy dietary patterns for the prevention of CVD complications and premature deaths among individuals with diabetes.

Mediterranean-style diet in pregnant women with metabolic risk factors (ESTEEM): A pragmatic multicentre randomised trial.

Al Wattar, B.H., J. Dodds, A. Placzek, L. Beresford, E. Spyreli, A. Moore, A. Moore, F.J. Gonzalez Carreras, F. Austin, N. Murugesu, T.J. Roseboom, M. Bes-Rastrollo, G.A. Hitman, R. Hooper, K.S. Khan, S. Thangaratinam, for the ESTEEM study group, 2019. Mediterranean-style diet in pregnant women with metabolic risk factors (ESTEEM): A pragmatic multicentre randomised trial. PLoS Med 16(7): e1002857. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pmed.1002857

Background: Pregnant women with metabolic risk factors are at high risk of complications. We aimed to assess whether a Mediterranean-style diet reduces adverse pregnancy outcomes in highrisk women. Methods and findings: We conducted a multicentre randomised trial in 5 maternity units (4 in London and 1 in Birmingham) between 12 September 2014 and 29 February 2016. We randomised inner-city pregnant women with metabolic risk factors (obesity, chronic hypertension, or hypertriglyceridaemia) to a Mediterranean-style diet with high intake of nuts, extra virgin olive oil, fruits, vegetables, nonrefined grains, and legumes; moderate to high consumption of fish; low to moderate intake of poultry and dairy products; low intake of red and processed meat; and avoidance of sugary drinks, fast food, and food rich in animal fat versus usual care. Participants received individualised dietary advice at 18, 20, and 28 weeks’ gestation. The primary endpoints were composite maternal (gestational diabetes or preeclampsia) and composite offspring (stillbirth, small for gestational age, or admission to neonatal care unit) outcomes prioritised by a Delphi survey. We used an intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis with multivariable models and identified the stratification variables and prognostic factors a priori. We screened 7,950 and randomised 1,252 women. Baseline data were available for 593 women in the intervention (93.3% follow-up, 553/593) and 612 in the control (95.6% follow-up, 585/612) groups. Over a quarter of randomised women were primigravida (330/1,205; 27%), 60% (729/1,205) were of Black or Asian ethnicity, and 69% (836/1,205) were obese. Women in the intervention arm consumed more nuts (70.1% versus 22.9%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 6.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.3–10.6, p ≤ 0.001) and extra virgin olive oil (93.2% versus 49.0%; aOR 32.2, 95% CI 16.0–64.6, p ≤ 0.001) than controls; increased their intake of fish (p < 0.001), white meat (p < 0.001), and pulses (p = 0.05); and reduced their intake of red meat (p < 0.001), butter, margarine, and cream (p < 0.001). There was no significant reduction in the composite maternal (22.8% versus 28.6%; aOR 0.76, 95% CI 0.56–1.03, p = 0.08) or composite offspring (17.3% versus 20.9%; aOR 0.79, 95% CI 0.58– 1.08, p = 0.14) outcomes. There was an apparent reduction in the odds of gestational diabetes by 35% (aOR 0.65, 95% CI 0.47–0.91, p = 0.01) but not in other individual components of the composite outcomes. Mothers gained less gestational weight (mean 6.8 versus 8.3 kg; adjusted difference −1.2 Kg, 95% CI −2.2 to −0.2, p = 0.03) with intervention versus control. There was no difference in any of the other maternal and offspring complications between both groups. When we pooled findings from the Effect of Simple, Targeted Diet in Pregnant Women With Metabolic Risk Factors on Pregnancy Outcomes (ESTEEM) trial with similar trials using random effects meta-analysis, we observed a significant reduction in gestational diabetes (odds ratio [OR] 0.67, 95% CI 0.53–0.84, I2 = 0%), with no heterogeneity (2 trials, 2,397 women). The study’s limitations include the use of participant reported tools for adherence to the intervention instead of objective biomarkers. Conclusions: A simple, individualised, Mediterranean-style diet in pregnancy did not reduce the overall risk of adverse maternal and offspring complications but has the potential to reduce gestational weight gain and the risk of gestational diabetes.