Silveira, B.K.S., A. da Silva, D.M.U.P. Rocha, K. Waskow, H.S.D. Martino, J. Bressan, H.H.M. Hermsdorff, 2024. Brazil nut (Bertholletia excelsa H.B.K.) consumption in energy-restricted intervention decreases proinflammatory markers and intestinal permeability of women with overweight/obesity: A controlled trial (Brazilian Nuts Study). J Nutr. 154(9):2670-2679.
Background: Obesity is associated with low-grade inflammation and increased intestinal permeability (IP). The Brazil nut (BN) (Bertholletia excelsa H.B.K.) appears to be a promising dietary intervention to control inflammation by enhancing antioxidant defenses. Objectives: We aimed to assess the effect of daily BN consumption on inflammatory biomarkers and IP in the context of an energy-restricted intervention. Furthermore, we evaluated the correlation between the changes in these inflammatory markers and the changes in serum selenium and IP. Methods: In this 8-wk nonrandomized controlled trial, 56 women with overweight or obesity were allocated into 2 groups, both following an energy-restricted diet (−500 kcal/d). The control group (CO) consumed a nut-free diet, while the BN group consumed 8 g BN/d, providing 347.2 μg selenium (Se). Inflammatory cytokines were analyzed in plasma and Se in serum. IP was assessed using the lactulose/mannitol test (LM ratio). Results: Forty-six women completed the intervention. Both groups achieved similar energy restriction (CO Δ= −253.7 ± 169.4 kcal/d; BN Δ= −265.8 ± 141.8 kcal/d) and weight loss (CO Δ= −2.5 ± 0.5 kg; BN Δ= −3.5 ± 0.5 kg). The BN group showed lower values of C-reactive protein, tumor necrosis factor, interleukin (IL)1-β, IL-8, percentage lactulose excretion, and LM ratio than the CO group. Additionally, changes in serum Se concentration were predictive of changes in IL-8 concentration (β: −0.054; adjusted R2: 0.100; 95% confidence interval [CI]: −0.100; −0.007; P = 0.025), and changes in IL-8 were predictive of changes in the LM ratio (β: 0.006; adjusted R2: 0.101; 95% CI: 0.001, 0.011; P = 0.024). Conclusions: Regular intake of BNs can be a promising complementary dietary strategy for controlling low-grade inflammation and improving IP in women with overweight/obesity undergoing energy-restricted treatment. However, the effects of BNs seem to be Se status-dependent.
Vilela, D.L.d. S., A.d. Silva, A.C. Pelissari Kravchychyn, J. Bressan, H.H.M. Hermsdorff, 2024. Effect of nuts combined with energy restriction on the obesity treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Foods. 13(18):3008. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13183008
Obesity is a multifactorial disease that is difficult to control worldwide. Although nuts are recognized health foods, the application of food in obesity management is unclear. We systematically reviewed the literature and performed a meta-analysis to evaluate if nut consumption favors people on energy restriction (ER) dietary interventions. Four databases were used to search for eligible articles in May 2024. This review was conducted according to the PRISMA guide, and the bias risk of papers was evaluated. For the meta-analysis, we extracted the endpoint values of the group’s variables and estimated the effect sizes by the random-effects model. Sixteen and ten articles were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis, respectively. Almonds were evaluated in the majority of studies (n = 6). The consumption of nuts (28 to 84 g/d, 4 to 72 months) included in ER (–250 to 1000 kcal/d) did not differently affect anthropometry (weight loss, BMI, waist and hip circumferences), body composition (fat mass, fat-free mass, or lean mass), markers of glucose (glycemia and insulinemia), lipid metabolism (total cholesterol, HDL-c, LDL-c, LDL-c/HDL-c, or triglycerides), and systolic and diastolic blood pressure. In most analyses, stratifying studies by type of nut or intervention time did not present different results in the meta-analysis. As there are few studies, in addition to great methodological variability, more high-quality trials are needed to confirm these results.
Liu, W., E. Li, M. Hu, 2024. Efficacy of walnut supplementation in managing overweight and obesity: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. J. Funct. Foods. Volume 122, 106515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jff.2024.106515.
This study aimed to assess how effective walnut supplementation is in managing overweight and obesity. A thorough search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was carried out until March 2024. Two reviewers independently examined the suitability of studies and assessed the quality of reporting in the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that were included. The results indicated that adding walnuts to the diet significantly lowered total cholesterol (TC) levels (p < 0.0001) and low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) levels (p < 0.001). However, there was no notable difference in weight loss (p > 0.05) and body mass index (BMI) (p > 0.05) between those who received walnut supplementation and the control groups. Based on the RCT data, it appears that walnut supplementation can effectively decrease TC and LDL-C levels. Additionally, it seems to be a safe choice for individuals who are overweight or obese, as it did not have an adverse effect on body weight.
Nijssen, K.M., R.P. Mensink, J. Plat, D. Ivanov, H. Preissl, P.J. Joris, 2024. Mixed nut consumption improves brain insulin sensitivity: a randomized, single-blinded, controlled, crossover trial in older adults with overweight or obesity. Am J Clin Nutr. 119(2):314-323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajcnut.2023.12.010
Background: Improving brain insulin sensitivity, which can be assessed by measuring regional cerebral blood flow (CBF) responses to intranasal insulin, may prevent age-related metabolic and cognitive diseases. Objectives: This study aimed to investigate longer-term effects of mixed nuts on brain insulin sensitivity in older individuals with overweight/obesity. Methods: In a randomized, single-blinded, controlled, crossover trial, 28 healthy adults (mean ± standard deviation: 65 ± 3 years; body mass index: 27.9 ± 2.3 kg/m2) received either daily 60-g mixed nuts (15 g of walnuts, pistachio, cashew, and hazelnuts) or no nuts (control) for 16 weeks, separated by an 8-week washout period. Throughout the study, participants were instructed to adhere to the Dutch food-based dietary guidelines. During follow-up, brain insulin action was assessed by quantifying acute effects of intranasal insulin on regional CBF using arterial spin labeling magnetic resonance imaging. Furthermore, effects on peripheral insulin sensitivity (oral glucose tolerance test), intrahepatic lipids, and cardiometabolic risk markers were assessed. Results: Body weight and composition did not change. Compared with control, mixed nut consumption improved regional brain insulin action in 5 clusters located in the left (difference in CBF responses to intranasal insulin: -4.5 ± 4.7 mL/100 g/min; P < 0.001; -4.6 ± 4.8 mL/100 g/min; P < 0.001; and -4.3 ± 3.6 mL/100 g/min; P = 0.007) and right occipital lobes (-4.3 ± 5.6 mL/100 g/min; and -3.9 ± 4.9 mL/100 g/min; P = 0.028). A fifth cluster was part of the left frontal lobe (-5.0 ± 4.6 mL/100 g/min; P < 0.001). Peripheral insulin sensitivity was not affected. Intrahepatic lipid content (-0.7%-point; 95% CI: -1.3%-point to -0.1%-point; P = 0.027), serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentration (-0.24 mmol/L; 95% CI: -0.44 to -0.04 mmol/L; P = 0.019), and systolic blood pressure (-5 mm Hg; 95% CI: -8 to -1 mm Hg; P = 0.006) were lower after the mixed nut intervention. Conclusions: Longer-term mixed nut consumption affected insulin action in brain regions involved in the modulation of metabolic and cognitive processes in older adults with overweight/obesity. Intrahepatic lipid content and different cardiometabolic risk markers also improved, but peripheral insulin sensitivity was not affected.
